Concealed Weapon Permits: When Can You Legally Use Your Firearm?

If you are in the process of getting a concealed weapon permit, you may have some questions about what a concealed weapon permit means to you. You may be wondering what benefits are extended to you when it comes to being the holder of a concealed weapon permit. Through this article you are provided with some basic information about when you can and cannot use your firearm when you are the holder of a concealed weapon permit.

Historically, the standard that applied when it came to when a person could lawfully used a firearm or deadly force was that such an individual needed to be under threat of imminent and severe physical harm - a type of physical harm that likely would result in that individual's death unless the individual engaged in an act of self defense. In short, a person with a concealed weapon permit could use his or her concealed weapon to defend his or her self only if that individual's life clearly was being threatened.

Once again, tracking back into history, before a person could use deadly force, before a person could use a concealed weapon, that individual had to have ascertained that there was not reasonably avenue for escape the situation at hand. There simply was no other alternative available to that individual at the time beyond using the concealed weapon in his or her possession.

Finally, in some jurisdictions it was also necessary for a person with a concealed weapon to warn the person that he or she intended to use significant force - use his or her concealed weapon - if the person threatening the individual with a concealed weapon did not relent.

In more recent times, and since nearly all states have now enacted concealed weapon legislations, there have been some changes in the law in some states through which a person can use deadly force. For example, in some states a person no longer has to rule out a reasonable means of escape if he or she is facing life threatening harm. The need to give a warning has been eliminated in many states when it comes to the use of force in regard to self defense.

One of the more dramatic changes in a very few jurisdictions (most notably Texas) have started to move in the direction of allowing a person to use deadly force in limited situations when that individual's life is not threatened but whose significant property was at risk. Again, this is a controversial move but it is starting to occur in some jurisdictions at this juncture in time. It is not likely that this type of change will occur on a more widespread basis at this juncture in time.

NRA Warns Against New Gun Control Push ... From EPA

The National Rifle Association, already on high alert over gun control rumors, has gone to battle stations to fight a new scheme before the Environmental Protection Agency to restrict hunters and anglers from using lead bullets, shot and sinkers.

Environmental Protection Agency Reviewing Petition to Ban Lead Bullets

Will Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson make a back door move to ban lead bullets the day before the November 2 elections?

Kagan on guns: Court precedents are 'settled law'

Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan says she considers recent high court decisions expanding gun rights to be "settled law."

"Open" gun slingers to rally in DC

"Those coming to the "Restore the Constitution" rally give Obama no quarter for signing the law that permits them to bring their guns to Fort Hunt, run by the National Park Service, and to Gravelly Point on the banks of the Potomac River.

East Palo Alto cop takes heat for Facebook remarks - San Jose Mercury News

Apparently EPA Detective Rod Tuason advocates the use of deadly force against citizens legally carrying a firearm. Not a good idea to post that on your Facebook account.